Field evaluation of a real time loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (RealAmp) for malaria diagnosis in Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre, Brazil

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-date
2018xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
xmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.show_fullxmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-uri
http://patua.iec.gov.br//handle/iec/3319xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-author
Viana, Giselle Maria Rachid
Silva-Flannery, Luciana
Barbosa, Danielle Regina Lima
Lucchi, Naomi
Valle, Suiane Costa Negreiros do
Farias, Sâmela
Barbalho, Nayara
Marchesini, Paola
Rossi, Juliana Chedid Nogaredi
Udhayakumar, Venkatachalam
Póvoa, Marinete Marins
Oliveira, Alexandre Macedo de
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-abstract
Conventional molecular methods, such as nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are
very sensitive for detection of malaria parasites, but require advanced laboratory equipment
and trained personnel. Real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RealAmp), a loopmediated
isothermal amplification-based molecular tool (LAMP), facilitates rapid target
amplification at a single temperature setting, reducing the need for sophisticated equipment.
We evaluated the performance of a field-adapted RealAmp assay for malaria diagnosis in
Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre State, Brazil, a remote area in Brazil with limited laboratory capabilities.
We enrolled 1,000 patients with fever (axillary temperature 37.5 C) or history of fever
in last 24 h presenting for malaria diagnosis from February through June 2015. DNA was
extracted from dried blood spots using a boil and spin method (heat treatment) at the sample
processing site, and also using commercial kits at a Brazilian national reference laboratory.
RealAmp was performed for Plasmodium genus, P. falciparum, and P. vivax identification.
In addition, Giemsa-stained blood smears were prepared and examined by two independent
well-trained study microscopists. A combination of Real-time PCR and nested PCR was
used as reference test. The sensitivity and specificity of RealAmp in the field site laboratory
were 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.1–96.8) and 83.9% (95% CI: 81.1–86.4),
respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of local microscopy were 87.7% (95% CI: 82.6–
91.7) and 98.9% (95% CI: 97.8–99.4), respectively, while study microscopy showed sensitivity
of 96.4% (95% CI: 93.0–98.4) and specificity of 98.2% (95% CI: 97.0–99.0). None of
the three tests detected 20 P. falciparum and P. vivax mixed infections identified by the reference
test. Our findings highlight that it is possible to implement simple molecular tests in
facilities with limited resources such as Cruzeiro do Sul in Brazil. RealAmp sensitivity was
similar to that of microscopy performed by skilled professionals; both RealAmp and study microscopy performed poorly in detection of mixed infection. Attempts to develop and evaluate
simpler molecular tools should continue, especially for the detection of malaria infection
in remote areas.
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation
VIANA, Giselle Maria Rachid et al. Field evaluation of a real time loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (RealAmp) for malaria diagnosis in Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre, Brazil. PLoS One, v. 13, n. 7, e0200492, p. 1-11, Jul. 2018.xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-decsPrimary
Malária / diagnósticoMalária Falciparum / parasitologia
Malária Vivax / parasitologia
Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real / métodos
Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico / métodos
Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos
Sensibilidade e Especificidade
Brasil / epidemiologia
Região Norte
Cruzeiro do Sul (AC)