xmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.show_simple
Estudos sôbre Diarréias agudas. I Eficácia relativa da coprocultura comparada ao swab-retal no isolamento de Shigellas (Publicado originalmente em 1956)
dc.contributor.author | Maroja, R. C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lowery, W. D | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-26T18:12:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-26T18:12:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | MAROJA, R. C; LOWERY, W. D. Estudos sôbre Diarréias agudas. I Eficácia relativa da coprocultura comparada ao swab-retal no isolamento de Shigellas (Publicado originalmente em 1956). In: INSTITUTO EVANDRO CHAGAS (Belém). Memórias do Instituto Evandro Chagas, v. 6. Belém: Instituto Evandro Chagas, 2002. p. 103-110. (Produção científica, v. 6). | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 85-86784-07-9 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://patua.iec.gov.br//handle/iec/3404 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The rectal swab and the stool culture were compared in order to verify their relative efficacies in the isolation of Shigella. A total of 320 cases were included in this study. Triplicate examinations by swab and stool were attempted in each case but this was not always possible. There was a total of 652 examinations either by swab or stool. Of these 35.4% were positive by swab which only 19% were positive by stool. When divided into symptomatic groups according to those with blood in the stool and those without, there is a closer relationship and most especially when more then one examination is used. In cases with fever and blood and with three successive examinations by stool and swab 68% were positive by swab and 71% positive by stool culture. In cases with blood without fever, 64.5% were positive by swab and 58% by stool. In cases with fever only there were 23.6% positive by swab and 22.4% positive by stool. In milder cases, without either of these symptoms the swab gave 25.5% positive while the stool gave only 11.6%. Therefore it may be seen that except in milder cases the three successive stool culture closely approximates the swab and may be used as a satisfactory substitutes when for various reasons the swab cannot be used. | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | por | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | MS/SVS/Instituto Evandro Chagas | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
dc.title | Estudos sôbre Diarréias agudas. I Eficácia relativa da coprocultura comparada ao swab-retal no isolamento de Shigellas (Publicado originalmente em 1956) | pt_BR |
dc.type | Capítulo de Livro | pt_BR |
dc.subject.decsPrimary | Diarreia / classificação | pt_BR |
dc.subject.decsPrimary | Diarreia / diagnóstico | pt_BR |
dc.subject.decsPrimary | Shigella / isolamento & purificação | pt_BR |
dc.subject.decsPrimary | Shigella / patogenicidade | pt_BR |
dc.subject.decsPrimary | Técnicas Bacteriológicas | pt_BR |
dc.subject.decsPrimary | Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico | pt_BR |
dc.creator.affilliation | Ministério da Educação e Saúde. Serviço Especial de Saúde Pública. Instituto Evandro. Belém, PA, Brasil. | pt_BR |
dc.creator.affilliation | Ministério da Educação e Saúde. Serviço Especial de Saúde Pública. Instituto Evandro. Belém, PA, Brasil. | pt_BR |