Oropouche virus I. A review of clinical, epidemiological, and ecological findings
Autor
Pinheiro Filho, Francisco de Paula
Rosa, Amélia Paes de Andrade Travassos da
Rosa, Jorge Fernando Soares Travassos da
Ishak, Ricardo
Freitas, Ronaldo Barros de
Gomes, Maria de Lourdes Contente
Leduc, James W
Oliva, Otavio F. P
Resumo
Between 1961 and 1978 seven outbreaks of Oropouche (ORO) vírus have been
documented in Pará State, Brazil. The clinical picture of ORO infection is characterized by
fever, chills, headache, muscle pain, arthralgia, and other minor clinical manifestations. No
deaths have to date been attributed to the disease but a proportion of patients become severely
ill, occasionally to the point of prostration. Recurrence of symptoms has been observed in
some patients, especially within the first 10 days after the initial symptoms. In some patients
asthenia was noted for a period of 2~4 weeks. Outbreaks of ORO virus occurred in both
small and large urban centers. In the largest urban centers the virus was limited to certain
districts, whereas in villages the agent was spread throughout. Dissemination of ORO vírus
to severallocalities was observed in the 1967 Bragança and in the 1975 Santarém outbreaks.
Over 30,000 persons became infected during these epidemics. AlI. age groups were affected
and the female:male attack ratevaried from 1:1 to 3:1 in the different localities. Culicoides
paraensis and Culex quinquefasciatus were the most common anthropophilic hematophagous
arthropods in the epidemic arfas. Virological and epidemiological evidence points to C. paraensis
as the main urban vector of ORO vírus. Successful experimental transmissions by the
bite of C. paraensis further support the role of this midge as a vector. About 10% of patients
infected with ORO vírus develop viremia levels capable of infecting C. paraensis. It is conceivable
that the urban cycle of ORO virus involves a man-to-man cycle maintained by C.
paraensis. Since the maximum duration of the urban cycle is apparently only 6 months it
seems likely that the vírus is perpetuated by a sylvatic cycle. It is possible that certain species
of primates, sloths, and wild birds can act as vertebrate hosts for the ,virus. Little is known,
however, about the forest vector of ORO virus.
Referência
PINHEIRO FILHO, Francisco de Paula et al. Oropouche virus I. A review of clinical, epidemiological, and ecological findings. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, v. 30, n. 1, p. 149-160, 1981.DeCs
Infecções por Arbovirus / epidemiologiaInfecções por Arbovirus / transmissão
Ceratopogonidae